Niccol Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Niccol Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu - Essay Example Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu both present their perspectives differently and intelligently. On the topic of characters of a leader, Machiavelli presents well-built judgments as to in which way a ruler should act when in power. He notes down about whether it is great to be feared or loved, eventually arriving to a close that a leader must be dreaded in order to govern his people. This brings about the opinion that the leader loved by the citizens is not working as expected. Machiavelli gives strong convictions in his writing of the prince who he gives the need to control. He recommends a stern leader to be stern, maintaining and obtaining power. In his presentation, he depicts a power hungry leader. He evidently employs the argumentation rhetorical strategy to depict the qualities of the prince. This he expects the citizens to be loyal to. He explains responsibility, bad and good reputations, and being well informed in history and military. This is among the instances that he depicts a pos itive attitude towards the essential goodness of the citizens. He has a strong stand that a leader desires to be alleged to be powerful and strong. Machiavelli presents a leadership style in which the leader takes credit for all good in the government. He presents the argument that it is essential to not appear feeble to others, particularly the people. This brings clearly how his point of view shades his understanding of the relationship between government and the people. The prince does not trust his people, and his role is evidently, a dictator. Lao-Tzu’s view on the qualities of a leader is exceptionally dissimilar to that of Machiavelli’s. His suggestion of a leader is moral, modest and compassionate. He insists that a leader ought to be treasured by his citizens. This presents the idea that Machiavelli has positive attitude towards the essential goodness of the citizens. There is a complete assumption that the citizens will show this goodness in return. In the pr ince Niccolo employs political rhetoric. This is a rhetorical strategy used to convince an individual to adopt a viewpoint. He gives an exact detail of all the things the prince must do in order to be successful. This type of rhetorical strategies is similar to Socrates. By this, Machiavelli warns about political rhetoric and at the same time employs it to his advantage. In another instance, he warns about flattery and at the same time employs it to refer to the Medicis. Lao Tzu, on the other hand, employs religious rhetoric that are based on the beliefs of the Tao. This is present when he refers to the Tao in some instances. The Tao explains that when an individual does nothing every other thing falls into place. In an example, in the Tao-te Ching Lao-tzu affirms that if a leader wants to be a remarkable then they must learn to pursue the Tao, desist from trying to

Introduction to decision making Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Introduction to decision making - Assignment Example Although whether he elects to sell or hold on to the company’s most expensive assets in the anticipation that better circumstances can prevail. The task to make the decisions that will help in ameliorating the status of Qantas would be a difficult one with multiple challenges (Rao, 2010). Qantas has continually experienced challenges from high costs of jet fuel just like many other Local Airlines. Quite recently, the Flying Kangaroo has also faced local challenges where it is forced to cope with a commercial slowdown and increasing rivalry with the Virgin Australia Holdings. In order to continually grow profits, someone ought to introduce stern principles and make harsh decisions in order to compete in the airline business (Rao, 2010).The decision to either sell or retain the Airline’s most priced assets would be a difficult decision to make for any expert. However decision to undertake either of the two procedures is a risky trail to take. The decision of Alan Joyce was a strategic, tactical as well as an operational one. The principal objective of the decision is to sustain the company in the local airline competition and counter the Virgin Australia for its customers; for this reason, it can be said that the move is strategic. The plan is tactical because t here would counter the other Local Airlines by stealing customers from them. Qantas needed to deal with its declining market share and losses in its transnational operations through improving its competitiveness. With regards to the domestic scene, Joyce had to address the challenges from the Virgin Australia. The competitor Virgin Australia set up a program share accord with other global giants such as Delta Airlines and Singapore. Joyce took a draconian counteractive step by instituting central structural changes to the company’s operations. The action made losses of up to $200 million. Joyce made another decision to initiate new airlines,